Image via Amazon MGM Studios
By
Jeremy Urquhart
Published Feb 4, 2026, 10:07 PM EST
Jeremy has more than 2200 published articles on Collider to his name, and has been writing for the site since February 2022. He's an omnivore when it comes to his movie-watching diet, so will gladly watch and write about almost anything, from old Godzilla films to gangster flicks to samurai movies to classic musicals to the French New Wave to the MCU... well, maybe not the Disney+ shows.
His favorite directors include Martin Scorsese, Sergio Leone, Akira Kurosawa, Quentin Tarantino, Werner Herzog, John Woo, Bob Fosse, Fritz Lang, Guillermo del Toro, and Yoji Yamada. He's also very proud of the fact that he's seen every single Nicolas Cage movie released before 2022, even though doing so often felt like a tremendous waste of time. He's plagued by the question of whether or not The Room is genuinely terrible or some kind of accidental masterpiece, and has been for more than 12 years (and a similar number of viewings).
When he's not writing lists - and the occasional feature article - for Collider, he also likes to upload film reviews to his Letterboxd profile (username: Jeremy Urquhart) and Instagram account.
He has achieved his 2025 goal of reading all 13,467 novels written by Stephen King, and plans to spend the next year or two getting through the author's 82,756 short stories and 105,433 novellas.
Sign in to your Collider account
Add Us On
Summary
Generate a summary of this story
follow
Follow
followed
Followed
Like
Like
Thread
Log in
Here is a fact-based summary of the story contents:
Try something different:
Show me the facts
Explain it like I’m 5
Give me a lighthearted recap
It’s easy to talk about good documentaries, and though few ever set the box office on fire, they do get reviewed the same way movies do (just usually by fewer critics), and they are appreciated at awards shows, like the Oscars. So, the good ones get discussed, and usually obtain some level of attention. The bad ones either come and go very quickly, or they just don’t really make any kind of mark at all, and sometimes they're best left forgotten.
Apologies, then, for digging up a bunch of older ones (plus a release that, at the time of writing, is quite recent), since some of these are quite obscure. Maybe there are worse ones that have been forgotten more, or just weren’t watched by the person writing all this out (he’s watched more than 1000 feature-length documentaries, by the way), but the following are all well worth avoiding, in any event.
10 'The Mystery of D.B. Cooper' (2020)
This should’ve been a slam dunk, because the story of D.B. Cooper is endlessly fascinating, but in ways you're not really able to appreciate if all you know about the story is what you get in The Mystery of D.B. Cooper. Cooper’s identity is still unknown, hence the “Mystery” part of the title, and he got away with a large amount of money after hijacking a plane, and while onboard, he jumped out and then no one officially saw him ever again.
Even without any direct answers, this still should be interesting. Take a look at how David Fincher made a fruitless search for the Zodiac killer in Zodiac interesting, for example. The Mystery of D.B. Cooper is such a snooze, though, once it lays out the basics and then drones on for close to 90 minutes. You're better off just watching a well-made YouTube video about Cooper instead of this movie (like LEMMiNO’s, which is less than half-an-hour long and feels significantly more substantial and engaging).
9 'The Institute' (2012)
Image via Argot Pictures
Not to be mixed up with the 2019 Stephen King sci-fi/horror/thriller novel of the same name, 2012’s The Institute is a documentary about an alternate reality game. Though, that being said, both could sort of be called sci-fi and mystery-related, in some ways, but there’s probably more excitement about where The Institute (2012) could go, rather than ultimately does go, because when answers are provided, they disappoint.
You come away from The Institute not just feeling like it was muddled, but also like it pretty much wasted your time.
There really isn't all that much to this alternate reality game, and the film overall is confusingly structured and presented, albeit not in a way that proves thrilling or particularly interesting. It’s more confusing in a frustrating manner, and you come away from The Institute not just feeling like it was muddled, but also like it pretty much wasted your time while never really being concerned about making much sense in the first place.
8 '2040' (2019)
Image via Madman Entertainment
Some will call 2040 an underrated documentary, or maybe even a charming one, but nah, it’s corny. It’s like An Inconvenient Truth, but it wants to be a more optimistic look at global warming with a focus on how it can be tackled. Its intentions might be good, but the execution feels so off, especially with Damon Gameau, who inserts himself in the documentary, coming across as a strange mix of condescending and possibly naïve throughout.
There’s a sense of “everything’s going to be alright” that feels forced and tedious, at a point. Most of 2040 rings false, and the attempts at making the presentation energetic, light, or “fun” consistently backfire. Put another way, if you're skeptical about global warming, 2040 won’t persuade you. And, if you do believe it’s happening, you'll feel like you're part of the choir being preached to, but your preacher has a sore throat, his microphone’s not on, and all his attempts at humor feel rambling and awkward (maybe even a little creepy), so you could well start questioning why you're still in his choir.
7 'Hello, Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea' (2019)
Image via Netflix
Barely a movie, since it’s only a bit over an hour long and was just one of many titles that’s been haphazardly thrown onto Netflix in the past decade or so, Hello, Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea is setting itself up for eyebrows to be raised right from the jump, what with the title and all. Having a full stop in the middle of one’s title is cursed enough, but even that aside, there’s the rest of the title. That’s it. It’s a movie called Hello, Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea.
That’s the review. That’s the criticism. No, not really. The Chelsea here is Chelsea Handler, who’s best known for being a late-night talk show host, and this documentary has her exploring white privilege. It’s a topic that will turn people off straight away for different reasons, but could be done interestingly, or in a self-critical way that felt honest/sincere, but that’s not what you get here. Hello, Privilege. It’s Me, Chelsea is unfocused and ultimately says very little; even less than you'd expect when it’s only got 64 minutes with which to say something. But it says pretty much nothing. There’s a reason maybe three or four people talked about this when it came out in 2019, and then it went on to become pretty much entirely obscure in the years that followed.
6 '2016: Obama's America' (2012)
Image via Rocky Mountain Pictures
The central argument of 2016: Obama’s America is that if Barack Obama were to be re-elected in 2012, it would lead to disaster. It’s all very sensationalist and pessimistic, but easier to criticize post-2016, when looking at how things didn’t quite fall apart in the way the documentary might've feared. Still, putting the benefit of hindsight aside, it probably would've felt alarmist and a bit much in 2012.
It’s one of many documentaries directed by Dinesh D’Souza (co-directed with John Sullivan), and this kind of movie is what he does. Some people laugh at and criticize his work, some people remain blissfully unaware of it, and then others might well like what he does. He does keep making movies, so there must be some people who watch them. He leans very conservative, but in the interest of keeping things balanced and also criticizing filmmakers who lean left…
5 'Slacker Uprising' (2007)
Image via The Weinstein Company
In 2004, Michael Moore filmed a fairly obscure documentary called Captain Mike Across America, and it was about Moore trying to encourage younger voters to show up and vote in the 2004 election. In 2007, it was released, maybe because there was another election coming up in 2008, and then this documentary was re-titled and re-edited into something less compelling and useful called Slacker Uprising, which feels tremendously dated now, of course, but would've also felt dated in 2007 (well, 2008 was when it got released as Slacker Uprising).
In 2004, Moore also directed Fahrenheit 9/11, and that one had bite and some actual filmmaking skill behind it, as far as documentaries critical about George W. Bush were concerned. It was biased, sure, but persuasive. The same can be said about Bowling for Columbine. But Slacker Uprising feels, funnily enough, slack. It’s hard to imagine too many people being swayed by it if they had seen it in 2004, and then who it was even for in 2008, when it was re-edited and re-released as Slacker Uprising, who knows? It’s like he wanted a big documentary for 2008, but couldn’t be bothered making something else that was on the same level as Fahrenheit 9/11. That movie did get an almost sequel of sorts much later, in 2018, called Fahrenheit 11/9, and that one also admittedly wasn't great, but was a good bit better than Slacker Uprising.
4 'Death of a Nation' (2018)
Image via Quality Flix
Another Dinesh D’Souza documentary (this time with Bruce Schooley as co-director), Death of a Nation is gonzo in a way that might make it more surprising and fascinating than 2016: Obama’s America, though it’s ultimately shoddier in quality. It spends time looking at leaders from history, highlighting the Civil War and then even World War II, at one point, with the main argument (or so it seems) being that Donald Trump and Abraham Lincoln alike have faced relentless persecution from Democrats.
This whole thing takes you on the most bizarre of rides, and one that’ll probably feel dizzying regardless of where you yourself fall politically. Death of a Nation is a real fever dream of a documentary, and ordinarily, big swings should be somewhat appreciated, but the big swings here all miss, and it ends up feeling like one of the most chaotic documentaries ever made.
3 'Rolling Stone: Life and Death of Brian Jones' (2019)
Image via Chip Baker Films
The Rolling Stones were probably at their best during the 1970s, but they obviously had some undeniably iconic songs and albums during the 1960s, too (and that’s before going into the band’s longevity, and how they’ve more or less kept going many decades longer). So, Rolling Stone: Life and Death of Brian Jones should be interesting, because it’s about an interesting band, with a focus on Brian Jones, who was a member of The Rolling Stones early on.
Subscribe to the newsletter for smart doc picks
Craving clearer documentary guidance? Subscribe to the newsletter for candid critiques that flag films worth skipping, explain what goes wrong, and recommend better documentaries or concise alternatives so your next watch is actually worth it. Subscribe By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.The film wants to argue that Jones was essential and overlooked, all the while also trying to unpack how his death (in 1969, at the age of 27) was suspicious, but it does a poor job on both fronts. If you're not familiar with this era of The Rolling Stones, Rolling Stone: Life and Death of Brian Jones does little to convince you that Jones is the underappreciated key member of the band’s founding, and the look into the theories around his death also feels poorly argued and honestly quite tacky. And it tries to be about a significant band without having the rights to use any songs by The Rolling Stones, which makes it all feel extra cheap (that’s a nitpick, compared to the other problems, but it certainly doesn’t help).
2 'Melania' (2026)
Image via Amazon MGM Studios
The story surrounding Melania and its release (still ongoing, at the time of writing) is more interesting than the content of the documentary itself. It cost a lot of money, got very bad reviews from critics, but then has also been given very positive reviews by the viewers/fans who've seen it. One’s got to wonder, though, if a $40 million documentary about the wife of a Democrat President came out, and said so little, would Democrats be willing to not only watch it, but heap praise upon what they saw?
The subject of Melania is Melania Trump, and the film follows her around for a handful of weeks leading up to Donald Trump's second presidential inauguration. It’s easiest to liken it to an overlong episode of a not-very-good reality TV show; a feature-length one with a theatrical release, for some reason. It’s a blatant puff piece masquerading as a documentary, and if you're willing to dive into a rabbit hole, you'll find a lot about the movie that’s questionable, frustrating, and baffling. It’s an instant all-timer, if you're talking about all-time not-good documentaries, of course.
1 'Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle' (2016)
Image via Bad Mother Pictures, LLC
It’s a movie made with next to no money, so it might seem alarming to rank it over the astoundingly expensive Melania, but Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle feels as wrong as a true-crime documentary could possibly feel. And when you take into account the notion that true-crime documentaries are the ones that arguably have the most things that could go wrong, ethically and tonally, then that’s saying a lot.
It’s saying that a documentary can’t possibly be worse than Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle. It’s about a horrific crime, but you can’t even say “At least it’s raising awareness,” because it just feels tacky and weirdly exploitative, of the victim and of almost everyone else it features or interviews. The feeling you get watching this could not be worse or more despairing, and not all the horror and despair feels intentional. It’s abysmal on a technical and editing front, has no sense of pacing, features a weirdly flippant narrator, can’t communicate what it’s trying to say, and it feels disrespectful in a bunch of different ways. If you watched this and were turned off from ever sitting down to view another documentary ever again, that would honestly be understandable.
Like
Follow
Followed
Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle
Not Rated
Documentary
Crime
Drama
Release Date
April 1, 2013
Runtime
87 Minutes
Director
J. David Miles
Writers
J. David Miles
Powered by
Expand
Collapse
-
Movie
-
Melania
-
Goodnight, Sugar Babe: The Killing of Vera Jo Reigle
Subscribe to the newsletter for smart doc picks
Craving clearer documentary guidance? Subscribe to the newsletter for candid critiques that flag films worth skipping, explain what goes wrong, and recommend better documentaries or concise alternatives so your next watch is actually worth it. Subscribe By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.What To Watch
July 20, 2025
The 72 Best Movies on Netflix Right Now
Trending Now
7 Years After Being Cancelled, Stephen King’s 20-Episode Masterpiece Just Hit 12.3M+ Hours on Streaming
Markiplier’s Horror Film Debut Takes an Incredibly Boring Descent Into an Ocean of Blood – 'Iron Lung' Review
Gore Verbinski’s New 134-Minute Sci-Fi Romp May Be a Franchise Starter [Exclusive]